Category: Religion

  • All Saints Day Followed by All Souls’ Day

    All Saints Day Followed by All Souls’ Day

    Next Sunday is All Saints’ Day and the day after, as it is every year is All Souls’ Day. Have a happy all saints day, find your patron saint and read about him or her and ask for her or his intersession at the throne of God to love and follow his commandments as you should for your creator and in doing so be as happy as you can be in this world in preparation for the next.  During All Souls’ Day you should pray a rosary or offer up a mass for relatives etc. that might be in purgatory, on this day of remembrance of them.

  • List of Other books by Father Treacy

    List of Other books by Father Treacy

    If You liked understandability of the vicar of Christ series, by Father Treacy, listed in the last blog, here are some others, some of which were recently reprinted. All from Paulist press except for the last one which is from Arouca Press.

    After Death What? Heaven, Purgatory, Hell

    Gifts of the Holy Spirit and Sin, Law, Grace

    Stories of Great Saints for Children (at least 3 “volumes”)

    Stories of the Apostles for Children

    A Handbook of Political Philosophy – Based on the Encyclicals of Leo XIII

  • Books Simplifying Important Encyclicals Etc.. Understandable to Grade Schoolers

    Books Simplifying Important Encyclicals Etc.. Understandable to Grade Schoolers

         The these are part of the Voice of the Vicar of Christ Series by Rev. Gerald C. Treacy, S.J. with all first published before 1950 and published as pamphlets by The Paulist Press of New York.

    Praying With Christ (On the Encyclical Mediator Dei from Pope Pius XII)

    Christian State or Pagan Chaos (On the Encyclical Immortals Dei from Pope Leo XIII)

    Liberty-Man’s Greatest Gift (Human Liberty from Pope Leo XIII)

    Heaven’s Beginning (On the Encyclical Mystici Corporis Christi from Pope Pius XII)

    Labor’s Charter of Liberty (On the Encyclical Rerum Novarum from Pope Leo XIII)

    God and Liberty against Satan and Slavery (On the Encyclical Divini Redemptoris from Pope Pius XI)

    Rebuilding Society’s Social Order (On the Encyclical Quadragesimo Anno from Pope Pius XI)

    Love Undying (On the Encyclical Casti Connubii from Pope Pius XI)

    Education: True or False (On the Encyclical Divini Illius Magistri from Pius XI)

    I also found out that Father Treacy also published a book called Atheistic Communism: Encyclical Letter of His Holiness Pope Pius XI which I do not know the publisher for but found it on the Internet and plan to order it.   

  • Questions Often asked of Catholics as Answered by a Traditional Catholic Priest

    Questions Often asked of Catholics as Answered by a Traditional Catholic Priest

    This priest is one who was consecrated before 1957, at which time he would just have been classified as just a Roman Catholic Priest, without the qualification that he was a traditional priest. Back then all priest could celebrate the Latin mass, all priests believed as the church always believed, back to the time of Christ, so all priests were actually traditional Catholics!

    These Question were answered in the Pamphlet the Truth about Catholics, the new edition printed March 1, 1936 with a circulation of 1,300,000, published by the Catholic Literature Society by Reverend A. Copperstone, Malta.

    1. Don’t you Catholics adore relics and Saints?

        We don’t. If we did we would be idolators.  Now idolatry is worse than murder, for murder is directly against one’s neighbor, idolatry is directly against God.

    • Are you not narrow to believe that yours is the only true Church of Christ?

        We are not. Are you narrow for believing you God to be the only true God? Truth is one and can’t be mixed with untruth.  Since Christ set up but one Church, we refuse to believe more than one Church to be true.

    • What about so many bad Catholics?

        What about the millions of saintly ones who attend Mass daily before going to work?  Our Lord told us not to be scandalized when we see “cockle and wheat in His Church.”  But why blame the Church for bad Catholics? All the bad Catholics of the world are not the Catholic Church.  Then, they are bad because they forget their Catholic duties and dis grace their exalted condition, a matter of “fallen angels,” not to be seized with much eagerness so long as there is life there is hope for them. Is it not more profitable to speak about the unnumbered Catholic Martyrs and Saints?

    • Your Church is intolerant.

        Yes: she hates untruth, vice, humbug, and whatever Christ, her Bridegroom, hates.  She therefore condemns books that contain false doctrines, or calculated to injure the morals of peoples.  Again, if men make use of the politics to suppress or violate her rights or Christian Morality, then she exercises her rights from above, to protect her children and herself from evil.

    • Why can’t Catholics be Masons?

        One reason is that Masonry is a man-made religion with a doctrine and a ritual of its own: hence Catholics cannot belong to it any more than they can belong to, say, Islam.

    • You don’t deny the oath of the Fourth Degree, K. of C. [Knights of Columbus]?

        We do emphatically.  Since 1922 and oath of this kind has been invented and spread all over the country to poison America against Catholics generally and the Knights particularly.  Our Courts have proved that oath to be the “invention of an impious and venomous mind.”  Numbers of fair minded 32nd and 33rd degree Masons, past Grandmasters, such as Motley Hews Flint, Dana Reid Weller, William Rhodes Hervey and Samuel D. Burke, of California, have investigated the alleged oath and declared it to be “scurrilous, wicked and libelous.” (Congressional Record, Vol. 53, P. 2817).

    • What is the use of Monks and Nuns?

       Their lives are lives of prayer as those of Angels In Heaven.  Every Order has its own peculiar spirit and work.  You find our Monks and Nuns spending themselves in the service of their neighbor, in schools, hospitals, homes for the aged, refuges of the unfortunate and neglected; the care of prisoners, orphans, leper; the safeguarding of virtue among the unprotected.  No lives are more benevolent to poor suffering humanity.

    • Can’t you keep your religion to yourselves, leaving non-Catholics alone?

        We can’t. Ours is the Gospel of the Holy One who said, “Go ye and teach all nations . . .Ye are all brothers . . .  Love each other as yourselves; and not the Gospel of Cain who said, “Am I my brother’s Keeper?”  We are for truth, virtue, peace, Legitimate Authority, (everybody his due, tax to whom tax, honor to whom honor, in short, for al the cures needed by Society).

         RATHER THAN OBSTRUCT OUR MISSION, COME AND BE A TORCHBEARER OF TRUTH, A HEALER OF WUNDED HEARTS, A WORKER FOR THE KINGDOM OF GOD, A SOLDIER OF CHRIST; IN ONE WORD, A CATHOLIC, GREAT WILL BE OUR REWARD HEREAFTER.

  • Why be Catholic? from the pamphlet the Truth about Catholics

    Why be Catholic? from the pamphlet the Truth about Catholics

    This Question was answered in the Pamphlet the Truth about Catholics, the new edition printed March 1, 1936 with a circulation of 1,300,000, published by the Catholic Literature Society.

    Father Vaughan states this answer to the question “Why Be a Catholic?”:

         I was asked – Why am I a Catholic?  I said that among other reasons was this – that I had the strongest objections to going to hell.  Then came this further question: Do you then believe that all non-Catholics go to hell?  I replied that I hoped the vast majority of mankind would go to heaven – in fact, all outside the Catholic Church seemed to be furnished with through tickets.  I do not say that those outside the Catholic Church will be lost, because so many through no fault of their own, cannot accept the Catholic faith or believe in hell; but as all Catholics believe that the Catholic Church is and the one and only true church of Jesus Christ, and as they believe in hell.  Ther is no heaven for us outside the Catholic Church.  If we thought there was, we would cease ti be Catholics.  Our Divine Lord has set up one church and has told Peter what church it is, and we are Catholics today because we find the Roman Catholic Church is the only one that responds to our Lord’s description of His church; the only one which claims to be in unity with Peter; the only one which has shown during 1900 years that its principle of unity and stability is Peter living in his successors.

        Why be a Catholic?  Because we want to be members of some church,  and therefore we would be members of that particular church against which our Lord says that the gates of hell shall never prevail . You may have two houses exactly alike. But if the one is built on a rock you will go to it rather than to the one that is built upon sand.  So you may find around us many churches resembling the Catholic Church, but when you come to look at Our Lord’s teaching you find that His church is the church in unity with blessed Peter; that its source of stability and unity rises from that fact.

  • On the Resurrection

    On the Resurrection

    As a reminder of our hope as Catholics a few months after Easter, this is a sermon, once given by St. Augustine, Taken from the Fathers of the Church Pamphlets, formerly printed by Mary, Immaculate Queen of the Universe Center, in a pamphlet first published around 1958.

       (1) According to our custom, during these days the account of the Resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ is read from all the books of the holy Gospel.  In this selection [from Mark] we notice how the lord Jesus Himself chided His disciples, His first members who remained close to Him, because they did not believe that He, over whom they grieved as dead, was now alive. [Cf. Mark 16:14] They were the fathers of the faith, but not yet were they believers.  They did not yet believe, although they were made teachers so that the whole world might believe what they were destined to preach and what they were going to die for. They did not yet believe that He, Whom they had seen raising others from the dead, had arisen Himself. Deservedly, them, were they rebuked. They were revealed to themselves so they might recognize what they were through their own efforts and what they would be through Him.  Thus, too, Peter was revealed to himself, in that he manifested presumption when the Passion of the Lord was imminent, but wavered when the actual suffering materialized.  In person he saw himself; in person he grieved himself; in person he wept over himself; he turned to Him who had made him [Cf. Matt. 26:33-35, 69-75.] Behold, they still did not believe although they now saw. What has been His condescension in permitting us to believe what we do not see! We believe the words of those who did not trust their own eyes.

       (2) Moreover, the Resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ is a new life for those who believe in Jesus, and this is the sacrament of His Passion and Resurrection which you ought to know and discuss.  For, with good reason, Life came to death; with good reason, He, the Fountain of Life, whence one drinks in order to live, drank this chalice when He was under no obligation to do so.  Truly, Christ was under no obligation to die.  Let us examine the source from which death arose.  Sin is the father of death.  If there had been no sin, there would have been no death.  The first man received the law of God, that is, the command of God, with this stipulation: that, if he kept the law, he would life; if he violated it, he would die.  Gy not believing that he was going to die, man brought about his own death: and he discovered that He who had given the law had said what was true.  Thence [came] death; thence, morality; thence, fatigue; thence, wretchedness; thence, even after the first death, came a second death, that is, after the death in time came death for all eternity.  Therefore, every man is born subject to this condition of death, subject to these laws of the lower world, with the sole exception of that Man who became Man so that man might not perish.  For He came, hampered by no laws of death, as the Psalmist says: ‘Free among the dead. [Ps. 87:6]  Without concupiscence a virgin conceived Him to whom she, still a virgin, gave birth, remaining a virgin.  He lived without sin; He did not die because of His own sin; He shared with us our punishment, but not our sin.  Death is the punishment of sin.  The Lord Jesus Christ came to die; He did not come to sin. By sharing with us the penalty without the sin, He cancelled both the penalty and the sin.  What penalty did He cancel? That which was destined for us after this life.  Hence, He was crucified, so that on the cross He might show the destruction of our old man; and He rose again so that He might point out the newness of our life. For thus the apostolic teaching expresses it: ‘He was delivered up for our sins, and rose again for our justification.’ [Cf. Rom 4:25] To symbolize this fact, circumcision was imposed upon the ancients, so that on the eighth day every male child was circumcised. [Cf. Gen. 17:12] The circumcision was performed with stone knives [Cf. Jos. 5:2] ‘because Christ was the Rock.’[Cf. 1 Cor. 10:4] That circumcision typified the striping off of the carnal life on the eighth day through the Resurrection of Christ.  For the seventh day of the week is completed by the sabbath.  On the sabbath, the seventh day being the day of the sabbath, the Lord lay in the tomb.  He arose on the eighth day and His Resurrection renews us. Therefore, by rising on the eight day He circumcises us: in this hope we live.

      (3) Let us hearken to the Apostle when he says: ‘If you have risen with Christ.’  How do we rise when we are not yet dead?  What, then, is it that the Apostle intended to say by the words: ‘If you have risen with Christ’? Would Christ have risen again if He had not first died? Was the Apostle addressing persons who were still living, not yet dying, and yet rising again? What does he mean? Consider what he says: ‘If you have risen with Christ, seek the things that are above, where Christ is seated at the right hand of God.  Mind the things that are above, not the things, that are on earth. Gor you have died.’ [Col. 3:1-3] The Apostle himself says that, not I: nevertheless, he tells the truth, and for that reason I, too, say it.  Why do I say it? ‘I have believed, therefore have I spoken [Ps. 115:1] If we are living well, we are dead, and we have risen. Moreover, he who is not yet dead and has not risen is still living badly; and if he is living badly, he is not living; let him die, lest he die.  What does that mean, ‘let him die, lest he die’? Let him change himself, lest he be condemned. ‘If you have risen with Christ,’ I repeat the words of the Apostle, ‘seek the things that are above, where Christ is seated at the right hand of God.  Mind the things that are above, not the things that are on earth.  For you have died and your life is hidden with Christ in God.  When Christ, Your life, shall appear, then you too will appear with him in glory,’[Col. 3:1-5] These are the words of the Apostle.  I bid him, who is not yet dead to die; I bid him, who is still living badly, to change himself.  For, if he used to live badly and is not now doing so, he has died: if he is now living well, he has risen again.

       (4)  But what does it mean to live well? It means to seek ‘the things that are above, not the things that are on earth.’  How long are you going to be [on] earth and how long are you returning into earth/ [Cf. Gen. 3:19] How long are you going to lick the earth?  By loving the earth, you certainly lick it, and you become an enemy of Him of whom the Psalmist says: ‘An his enemies shall lick the ground.’ [Ps. 71:9] What were you? Sons of men.  What are you?  Sons of God.  ‘O ye sons of men, how long will you be dull of heart? Why do you love vanity and seek after lying? [Ps. 4:3] what lying do you seek? Now shall I tell your, I know that you wish to be happy.  Show me a robber, a scoundrel, a fornicator, an evil-doer, a law-breaker, a person stained with all vices, steeped in all crimes or outrages, who does not wish to be happy.  I know you all wish to live happily, but you do not wish to find our what it is that makes a man live happily.  You seek God because you think that you will acquire happiness form the possession of gold but gold does not make men happy.  Why do you seek for what is deceptive. Why do you wish to be exalted in this world? Because you think you will acquire happiness from the honor of men and from worldly display? But worldly display does not make men happy.  Why do you seek lying and whatever else you seek here? When you seek in a worldly fashion, When you seek through love of the earth, when you seek by clinging to the earth, you seek for one purpose, that is, that is to be happy; but no earthly object makes you happy.  Why do you not cease to look for what is deceptive? What, then will make you happy? ‘O ye sons of men, how long will you be dull of heart?’ Do you, who thus weigh your heart down with earth, not wish to be dull of heart?  How long were men dull of heart? Until Christ came, until Christ rose again, men were dull of heart. ‘How long will you be dull of heart? Why do you love vanity, and seek after lying?’  Though you wish to be happy, you are seeking things which make you unhappy.  What you are seeking is betraying you; what you are seeking is a lie.

         (5) Do you wish to be happy?  If you wish, I shall show you how you may be happy.  Continue to read that passage: ‘How long will you be dull of heart? Why do you love vanity and seek after lying? Ye–.’  What? – ‘that the Lord hat made his holy one wonderful [Ps. 4:3-5] Christ came to our miseries.  He was hungry and thirsty; He was weary and He slept; He worked wonders and He suffered evils; He was scourged, cowened with thorns, covered with spittle, beaten with cudgels, fixed to a cross, wounded with a lance, placed in a tomb. But He rose again on the third day when his work was finished and death was dead.  Lo, keep your eye fixed on His Resurrection, because ‘the Lord hath made his holy one wonderful’ to such a degree that he raised Him from the dead, and bestowed upon Him the honor of sitting at His right hand in heave. He showed you what your ought to attend to, if you wish to be happy, for here on earth you cannot be happy.  In this life you cannot be happy; no one can. You seek what is good, but earth is not the source of that which you seek.  What are you seeking?  A happy life. But it is not available here.  If you were looking for gold in a place where it did not exist, would not he who knew that it was not there say to you: ‘Why are you digging?  Why are you plowing up the earth?  You are digging a trench to descend into a place where you sill find nothing.’  What are you going to answer the one who proffers you this advice ?’I am looking for gold.’ And he answers: ‘I do not tell you that what you seek is of no importance, but I do say that it is not in the place where you are looking for it.’ Likewise, when you say: ‘I desire to be happy,’ [the answer may be given:] ‘ you seek what is good, but it is not in this place.’ If Christ had happiness here, so also will you.  But notice what He found in this land of your death.  When he came from another region, what did He find here except what abounds here? With you He ate what is plentiful in the cellar of you wretchedness. He drank vinegar here; He had gall , too.  Behold what He found in your cellar!  However, He has invited you to His own table abounding in all good things, the table of heaven, the table of the angels where He Himself is the bread.  Coming, then, and finding these unpalatable viands in your cellar, He did not disdain such a table as yours, but He promised you His own.  And what does he say to us? ‘Believe, just believe that you will come to the good things of My table inasmuch as I did not scorn the poor things of your table.’  He accepted your evil; will He not give you His good? Certainly, He will. He promised His life to us; but what He has done is more unbelievable. He offered His own life to us, as if to say: “I invite you to My life where no one dies, where life is truly blessed, where food is not corrupted, where it refreshes and does not fail.  Behold the place to which I invite you, to the abode of the angels, to the friendship of the Father and of the Holy Spirit, to the eternal banquet, to My companionship, finally, to Me Myself and to My life do I invite you. Do you not wish to believe that I will give you My life? Take My death as a pledge.’ Now, therefore, while we are living in this corruptible flesh, by changing our ways, let us die with Christ; by loving justice, let us live with Christ.  We shall not gain the happy life unless we shall have come to Him who came to us and unless we shall have begun to live with Him who died for us.

  • Dispelling Myths About What Catholics Do Not and Do Believe

    Dispelling Myths About What Catholics Do Not and Do Believe

    This list is taken from the pages of a pamphlet called “The Truth About Catholics,” published in march of 1936 by the Catholic Literature Society of Los Angeles, California. These were myths that existed back then and some of which remain today or have a chance of reappearing.

    —- Catholics DO NOT BELIEVE:

    That the Pope has temporal rights in the United States. That the Pope is God and can do no wrong.

    That the Pope can nullify laws, oaths or contracts.

    That Protestant Husband and wives are living in sin.  That marriages of Protestants are invalid.

    That children of Protestants are illegitimate.

    That Contracts with Protestants may be broken.

    That Protestants may be hated or persecuted.

    That Protestants will all be damned.

    That public schools are an evil.

    That they ought to be abolished or destroyed.

    That education ought not to be universal and free.

    That they can buy forgiveness of sin.

    That they can purchase freedom from Purgatory.

    That they can get indulgence to commit sin.

    That sin can be forgiven without repentance.

    That images may be worshiped.

    That anybody or thing may be worshipped or adored but the one True God.

    That the Blessed Virgin Mary is equal to God

    That divorce should be countenanced or allowed

    That Baptism is not necessary for salvation.

    —- Catholics DO BELIEVE

    That Truth is one and there can only be one true religion.

    That unity in doctrine is essential; and only one religion has this unity of doctrine.

    Clothes do not make the man.

    That trust in God and His mercy without faith and good works is presumption. [James 2:14-26]

    That philanthropy is not God-like charity.

    That mysteries and doctrines of the Church are not against reason, but may be above reason.

    That Baptism is necessary for salvation. That there must be an infallible authority to interpret the Bible; man’s reason is not infallible

  • The Bible On Divorce and the Injunction Against Remarriage

    The Bible On Divorce and the Injunction Against Remarriage

    Marriage among Catholics is primarily for the production and raising of children, to become citizens of heaven. In the very first book of the Bible Genesis 1:26-28 God’s first commandment to humans was to be fruitful and multiply (“And He said: let us make man to our image and likeness: and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea and the fowls of the air, and the beasts and the whole earth, and every creeping creature that moveth upon the earth. And God created man to His own image: to the image of God he created him: male and female He created them. And God blessed them saying: increase and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it, and rule over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and all living creatures that move upon the earth.”).

    Marriage is also to be permanent as long as the spouses live.  Specifically, divorce with remarriage is forbidden.  Separation due to the fact that a spouse is violent toward the other spouse or the children is acceptable, just not subsequent remarriage as long as the accompanying spouse is alive.  In the second chapter God declared marriage so permanent that a married couple are to become one flesh (Genesis 2:24 – “Wherefore a man shall leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they shall be two in one flesh”).  If you cut a being that is one flesh in half does that not usually kill the being? In this case it appears to say the being is killed spiritually support that fact that, in the Catholic Church, divorce and remarriage is a mortal sin.

    The cite in Ephesians 5:28-33, once again supports the permanence of marriage re-citing the exhortation by God to become one flesh and to treat each other in the marriage well because it mirrors Christ’s connection with the Church and indeed it is so important in the life of the church that in this cite Jesus Christ designates marriage a sacrament. Reinforcing this is 1 Corinthians 7:10-11 which says: “But to them that are married, not I but the Lord commandeth, that the wife depart not from her husband.  And if she depart, that she remain unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband.” So this passage says one cannot remarry if they leave but if the wish to be married have the option of reconciling.  And let not the husband put away his wife, and in Mark 10:2-12 the quote: “What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.”

    The permeance of marriage, so that if “it doesn’t work out” you can’t remarry unless your spouse dies, and the fact that the natural law was created by God so is unlawful to try to “get around” that law (i.e. if you have sex you have children) is why no one wants to follow the Catholic religion, and all implies about the permanence of marriage and the fact that marriage is for the production of children, but prefer Martin Luther’s interpretation that marriage is not a sacrament but a simple secular legal contract, who I understand married a num, forcing her to not only break her vows to God but also breaking his own vows of celibacy as a priest.

    The problem is that many that subscribe to the Christian philosophy an ex-catholic priest’s view of marriage concerning the permanence of marriage and its primary goal as reproduction as opposed to God the father’s injunction in Genesis and God the Sons injunction in Mark as well as through the apostle to the gentile’s interpretation – that is St. Paul to the Ephesians. Martin Luthur’s biggest failing was not wanting to be subject to any authority. Once when challenged on a religious opinion he held he used as a defense, and I’m paraphrasing here: because Dr. Martin Luther says so.

    1 Corinthians 7:27 and Romans 7:2 reinforce that a married couple is bound until death. Once one dies the other is free to remarry.  Matthew 19:1-12 reiterates that divorce is one thing, but given that, you cannot remarry.

    As for how married couples should treat one another, Ephesians 4:32 says “Be kind to one another, tender hearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.” This is a more general exhortation. And with regard to a vow such as one in a wedding: for better or worse until death do us part, see Ecclesiastes 5:4-6.

    These are reasons why the greatest of care must be taken in selecting a marriage partner. The most effort must be put into staying together, in both the spiritual and physical secular sense because separation is detrimental to the children and as can be seen in many divorces, as well as detrimental to at least the mental health of a woman/child in particular, if she chooses a physically abusive new significant other.

  • Pamphlet Review of “The Truth About Catholics” and a Prayer in it, by a Protestant, Not Mentioning Catholicism but Asking for the Help from God to Find the One True Faith given by God to Man. 

    Pamphlet Review of “The Truth About Catholics” and a Prayer in it, by a Protestant, Not Mentioning Catholicism but Asking for the Help from God to Find the One True Faith given by God to Man. 

    The pamphlet carries the Imprimatur of the Most Rev. John J. Cantwell, D.D., Bishop of Los Angeles and San Diego. It is the new edition of 1 March 1936.

    It is a basic Catholic apologetics pamphlet both defending and explaining various basic Catholic doctrines and dogmas.  The table of contents is as follows

    A Protestant Prayer [quoted below]                                      1

    Church or Bible                                                                       2

    Questions and Answers, Masonary, K.C. Oath                      4-5

    Why Be a Catholic                                                                    6

    The Visble Church                                                                    7

    The Rosary Explained                                                           10

    Confession                                                                   11

    Purgatory                                                                              12

    Adoration of Mary                                                                                      13

    Catholic Countries Unprogressive                                        14

    Why Priests do not Marry                                                                                     14

    Protestant Marriages                                                           15

    Departure of Non-Catholic Bodies from Apostolic Teaching  16

    History of Sects                                                                                         20

    The Bible an Authority only in Catholic Hands                                                                  21

    Which Guide Would You Take?                                                                                       28

    Abstract of Title from St. Peter to Present Pope [list of Popes from Peter to now]   29

    Is the Catholic Church the Church of the Ignorant [famous converts from the 30s] 32

    Modern Minds Shall Pass Away, But –                                  Back cover

    Catholic Beliefs [hopefully next blog – what Catholics DON’T and DO Believe] Back cover

    I will be publishing articles for this pamphlet, hopefully, intermittently, in the coming weeks, with the titles mentioned in the table of contents above being part of the blog titles, hopefully letting reader know when I do so.

    The prayer for guidance into Truth composed by Mr. Henry Mayer while a Protestant is as follows:

    God of all goodness, almighty and eternal, father of mercies and Savior of mankind!  I implore Thee by Thy sovereign goodness, to enlighten my mind and to touch my heart, that by means of true faith, hope and charity, I may live and die in the true religion of Jesus Christ. I confidently believe that, as there is but one Bod, there can be but one faith, one religion, one only path to salvation, and that every other path opposed thereto can lead to Perdition.  This path, O my God! I anxiously seek after, that I may follow it and be saved. There fore I protest before Thy divine Majesty, and I swear by all Thy divine attributes, that I will follow the religion which Thou shalt reveal to me to be the true one, and will abandon, at whatever cost, that wherein I shall have discovered errors and falsehood.  I confess that I do not deserve this favor for the greatness of my sins, for which I am truly penitent, seeing they offend God, who is so good, so holy, and so worthy of love! But what I deserve not, I hope to obtain form Thine infinite mercy, and I beseech Thee to grant it unto me through the merits of that precious blood which was shed for us sinners by Thine only Son, Jesus Christ our Lord, who liveth and reigneth God, world without end. Amen.

  • The Mystical Body of Christ’s Differentiation of Roles Such as Priest and Bishops Selected by the Church 

    The Mystical Body of Christ’s Differentiation of Roles Such as Priest and Bishops Selected by the Church 

    My belief is that on the road to Emmaus (Luke 25:13-35) is where some information not written in the Bible comes from by tradition in the Catholic Church where Jesus Christ explains Old Testament references to some disciples. But why did they not write it down, a letter possibly entitled: the Lords talk on the way to Emmaus? Because the two disciples were probably illiterate and they, over the course of their lives, passed on the information by word of mouth.

    The Ethiopian understanding that he needed Philip’s help to understand the Bible (Acts 8:26-40) is why you need an apostolic church and there can really only be one visible apostolic church otherwise you don’t know who to ask. These things make us part of one coherent body – the Mystical Body of Christ.

    The born again quote by Christ (John 3:3) means we are born again into the kingdom of God, not as white, black, Asian, Caucasian, Russian, Chinese, Korean, German, Italian, Greek, Japanese, Filipino, Mexican, Columbian, Canadian or American but as Roman Catholics (Galatians 3:28). The tower of Bable, the separation of mankind is repaired in the universality (the Greek Katholico meaning universal) of the Roman Catholic Church (even in the Churches name the 2 great ancient civilizations are joined – Greek and Roman). The common language of the Roman Catholic Church has been Latin for a millennia and a half – 1500 years. This common language made it possible for priest in different counties to talk to each other to coordinate operations such as the rescue of Jews during WWII just to use a recent example.

    The death on the cross is the consummation of Christs wedding with his bride because his death gives us the privilege of being born again into the Kingdom of Heaven as adopted sons and daughters of God.  Just as the marital act, an act produce by the will of at least one of two parties, can but won’t necessarily produce children between a man and a woman, Jesus Christs death won’t necessarily produce a citizen of heaven in any particular human being, but just as the marital act, might. Just as with Adam and Eve and the whole of salvation history, every one is the result of the cooperation of at least 2 people but their ultimate destiny is in their hands.

    The whole concept of the mystical body of Christ is introduced most clearly in 1 Corinthians 12:12-27 which says: 12 For just as ithe body is one and has many members, and all the members of the body, though many, are one body, jso it is with Christ. 13 For kin one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—lJews or Greeks, slaves1 or free—and mall were made to drink of one Spirit.

    14 For the body does not consist of one member but of many. 15 If the foot should say, “Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body,” that would not make it any less a part of the body. 16 And if the ear should say, “Because I am not an eye, I do not belong to the body,” that would not make it any less a part of the body. 17 If the whole body were an eye, where would be the sense of hearing? If the whole body were an ear, where would be the sense of smell? 18 But as it is, nGod arranged the members in the body, each one of them, oas he chose. 19 If all were a single member, where would the body be? 20 As it is, there are many parts,2 yet one body.

    21 The eye cannot say to the hand, “I have no need of you,” nor again the head to the feet, “I have no need of you.” 22 On the contrary, the parts of the body that seem to be weaker are indispensable, 23 and on those parts of the body that we think less honorable we bestow the greater honor, and our unpresentable parts are treated with greater modesty, 24 which our more presentable parts do not require. But God has so composed the body, giving greater honor to the part that lacked it, 25 that there may be no division in the body, but that the members may have the same care for one another. 26 If one member suffers, all suffer together; if one member is honored, pall rejoice together.

    27 Now qyou are the body of Christ and individually rmembers of it.

    Priest by tradition are thought of as “altus Christus” or other Christs, this is why they are called “father” as the head of the parish family, with the local parish/church as the bride of Christ. That this is the correct interpretation can be found in Galatians 2:19-21

    19 For I, through the law, am dead to the law, that I may live to God: with Christ I am nailed to the cross.

    20 And I live, now not I; but Christ liveth in me. And that I live now in the flesh: I live in the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and delivered himself for me.

    21 I cast not away the grace of God. For if justice be by the law, then Christ died in vain.

    Paul’s love for his “parishioners” or diocese as a bishop not because of the law directly, but if he loves his parishioners then he will not drift from the law (Galatians 5:14), but it is the love of God through Paul exemplified by Jesus Christ’s life and death on the cross that informs his actions.

     There are different functions in the same community/body: “some apostles [bishops], some prophets, some and others some evangelists, and others some pastors [priests] (Ephesians 4:11).  This is show that Jesus Christ envisioned there being different functions in his church and it makes sense that who-should -be-what should be selected by merit by the church as Mathias was as a replacement to Judas by the apostles or those who would be their successors – present day bishops. This concept is reinforced in 1 Corinthians 12:28.

    The fact that the guiders or principals of a religion, usually priests (empowered to offer sacrifice for/with the people of the religion), were selected by God, is not new.  In fact it was the case in the precursor of the Roman Catholic church the Jewish religion.  In the Jewish religion the priest were picked by natural law (decedents of Levi and specifically Aaron for high priests Exodus 18:1-5).  To allow for peoples other than Jews to be selected, supernatural law, selection by the apostles, guided by the Holy Ghost, as in the case of Mathias, was the rule in Jesus Christ’s Catholic Church. Christ said He came to fulfil the (Jewish) law not to abolish it. if this is true, after 2 of the most important books in Jewish law: Leviticus and numbers, were written for priest why would Jesus Christ, as suggested by Martin Luther, abolish the priesthood as differentiated from unconsecrated Christians? He would not. In the Old Testament in the book of Numbers chapter 16 God showed what he thought of priests as having a separate vocation from unconsecrated people when He physically and destroyed Korah’s rebellion when Korah and his hoard suggested otherwise. Many would say “but there was also so much describing dietary restrictions.” My reply to that would be: those were all removed when in Mark 7:15 Jesus Christ basically said there is nothing outside of a man that enters into him that can defile him, but the thing that proceeds from him that is what defile him.

     The information in the square brackets was added for emphasis and clarity to the original bible quotes.