A supernatural solution to the churches problems assuming the problems originate from the supernatural defect in the ordination of priests and the consecration of bishops, discussed above, a so called nuclear option is possible and here it is: VALIDLY CONSECRATED ORDAINING BISHOPS THAT ORIGINATE FROM THE OLD PRE-1968 LATIN RITE, NEED TO REVIEW THE DIOCESAN FILES OF EACH EPISCOPAL CANDIDATE INCLUDING ANY “SECRET” FILES and INTERVIEW EVERY BISHOP THEY ARE ASKED TO ORDAIN/CONSECRATE by THE POPE and upon selecting (based on the fact that they are not child abusers or manifest other psychological problems recognized by the pre-1960 church and accept and propound traditional church dogma) the BISHOPS they discern to be GOOD BISHOPS, ORDAIN THEM USING THE PRE-1968 LATIN ORDINATION RITE OF PRIESTS (for those not ordained using the pre-1968 Latin rite) FOLLOWED BY THE EPISCOPAL CONSECRATION OF ALL THE NEW CANDIDATES FOR THE EPISCOPATE. All priest and bishops in the church at the time, who were not from the time when they were required to take the “pledge against modernism,” must be required to take that pledge again as mandated by Pius X. Though this would be a great start, one step forward, what would be one step back is to do the bishops priestly ordination along with the un-vetted other priests in the dioceses. To prevent rape of children and homosexual rape of our seminarians the church needs to vet all candidates for both the priesthood and the episcopacy.
To do this right, those validly re-ordained and/or re-consecrated bishops then need to re-ordain all of their vetted diocesan priests as well as episcopally re-consecrate any of their extensively vetted auxiliary bishops using the known valid Latin rites and the Pope, as did Pope Pius V, needs to mandate that only the Latin form of the priestly ordinations, the Latin form of the episcopal consecration, as well as only the old Latin form of the rest of the six sacraments (including the exorcism at baptism) along with the Tridentine Latin Mass needs to be used henceforth and forever. Careful review of the files insures getting rid of any “bad” bishops (there is always a suspicious trail of evidence when a bad priest or even bishop is moved around as well as normal and secret files). Each validly consecrated bishop doing the vetting should have a team of a minimum of 2 priest and 2 laity (one a practicing licensed psychologist or psychiatrist) to help him review the files for both original episcopal consecrations and subsequent priestly ordinations. The candidates should then receive at least a 6 month re-indoctrination into the magisterium’s interpretation of Roman Catholic Church dogma and doctrine (i.e. the catechism of Trent with Vatican I additions) as well as briefing on things considered sexual molestation/abuse/assault before the evidently defective Vatican II changes which resulted in the production of pedophile priest and sexually predatory clergy (of both heterosexual and homosexual orientation) like Cardinal McCormick. That way the church is covered from the legal standpoint and the modernist can’t use some argument like the method is not scientific to try and stop the process.
If you want to get Draconian on the whole system to doubly insure, from a secular perspective that no (or at least the fewest) undesirables get through you can ask questions and analyze the answers against a simultaneous MRI brain scan (with a expert analyzing whether or not the subject is lying) to scientifically discern lying and find out to a better level of certainty whether the subject believes sodomy is okay, relations with a female parishioner is okay, modernism/heresy in general is okay etc. Finally, as I understand from a book I read entitled Gladio: The Unholy Alliance Between The Vatican, The CIA, and The Mafia by Paul L. Williams, Italian authorities require all secret societies to file rosters of their members with the Police. Many bishops and cardinals were found, evidently from these files by Mr. Williams to be masons. The pope needs to get the most recent roster, laicize/defrock (i.e. kick out of the clergy – remove them from the Roman Catholic clerical hierarchy) all bishops, cardinals and priests, found to be on it. Also if there is a way to discern communist and devil worshipers, do the same to them. Boom, fixed.
The logic of the above Strategy is well tested and proven effective in software engineering. It is a software strategy utilized when recently loaded software used to drive programable electronic devices like computers, telephone switches, and the like, turn out to not work as expected and is known as “rolling the version back to the last known good version.” The last know good ordinations/consecrations which have discerned/produced an overwhelmingly large population of holy priest was the pre-1967 Latin rite (in effect essentially since about 400 AD in the same form). There are lots of reasons which can be cited arguing that this role back to the pre1967 rite is not necessary nor desirable (a favorite one for modernist is “we must get with the times and we can’t start using Latin again” – I will relate in a future blog many reasons why we should be using Latin again and, one eschatological reason, why indeed it is essential we start using Latin again in light of mercy to our Jewish brethren), but our Catholic children, as they have for almost twenty centuries, will determine the direction and fate of the world. Aren’t they priceless and is my suggestion not just a very small price to pay for the insurance of their eternal life and the life of the world?
Now the pride of all involved will probably prevent this from ever happening but if it were to happen with Father Ratzinger sitting the chair of Peter, the ultimate show of humility and the best case scenario would be for him to accept being re-consecrated using the old Latin rite by a known valid bishop, finally (after 4 popes) bring back the tiara from the United States and accept the papal tiara and agree to receive the papal coronation (along with the pledge that they have made for centuries up until John XXIII, more on that in a future blog) that is probably at least 10 centuries old for the first time in 60 years, before asking his bishops to, in humility, do the same. This would be the best for any bishop/cardinal consecrated before 1968 who might next ascend the chair of Peter. If the bishop selected were to have been consecrated after 1968 he should be re-ordained a priest (if ordained with the pre 1968 Latin priestly rite of ordination in addition to being re-consecrated a bishop by the old pre-1968 Latin Episcopal consecration) by a bishop consecrated in the pre-1968 rite of episcopal consecration, accept the papal tiara and receive the papal coronation using the pre-1968 Latin rite as well as take the oath against modernism if he hasn’t already .
This level of action would not only show a profound appreciation for the seriousness of the problem, but assure both good laity and good clergy that both the abuse crisis and the problem of modernism had been laid to rest, hopefully at least in our lifetime. It would also restore the faith of the world in the true, one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church established by the Son of God – Jesus Christ. This would once again show the divine protection of the Holy Ghost for all to see.
This might be forced, by the laity, if they had a true concern for simply the physical welfare of their children not to mention the more important subject of the spiritual welfare of their children. And the laity should not feel in the very least bit ashamed to ask for this if they they gather together in Jesus Christ’s name (with faithful clergy and religious) with the aim to save their “little ones” (Matthew 18:20, Galatians 1:3-12).
Unless I am mistaken I think the Ultimate Authority in the church once said (yes even higher than the Pope – the Actual Person of God and perfect human that laid down the original authoritative guidance for the church or at least that’s what traditionalists believe):
See that you despise not one of these little ones: for I say to you. that their angels in heaven always see the face of my Father who is in heaven.
For the Son of Man is come to save that which was lost. What think you? If a man have an hundred sheep and one of the should go astray: doth he not leave the ninety-nine in the mountains, and go to seek that which is gone astray?
And if it so be that he find it: Amen I say to you, he rejoiceth more for that, than for the ninety-nine that went not astray.
Even so it is not the will of your Father, who is in heaven, that one of these little ones should perish.
But if thy brother shall offend against thee, go, and rebuke him between thee and hi alone, If he shall hear thee, thou shalt gain thy brother.
And if he will not hear thee, take with the one or two more: that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may stand.
And if he will not hear them: tell the church. And if he will not hear the church, let him be to thee as the heathen and publican.
Amen I say to you, whatsoever you shall bind upon earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatsoever you shall loose upon earth shall be loosed also in heaven.
Again I say to you, that if two of you shall consent upon earth, concerning any thing what so ever they shall ask, it shall be done to the by my Father who is in heaven.
For where there are two or three gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.
The words of Jesus Christ quoted from Matthew 18:10-20.
Evil priest and bishops have preyed upon our children long enough. This is becoming another holocaust, one resulting in the wholesale damnation of numerous souls if for no other reason but the loss of faith. If we were asking them to hang these evil men, it should give us pause, but to select good ones and let the rest go, not so much.
Also, look at this passage. It is as if Jesus Christ saw our times and wrote this passage especially for it. Could it be, as traditionalists believe, that God is all-knowing? First, He talks of the harm to “little ones” which could also refer to our children. Then He talks about eliminating the bad people among us by first speaking to them privately, then as a group (the Dubai) then bringing them in front of the church and then if they do not justify themselves, they are all (those who are known to be in the same “club” together in agreement with the modernist ways of letting our children be abused), simply are no longer in the church. Once the chaff is eliminated, the church fathers in the clergy, that are still true to the faith, should come together in the name of the Jesus Christ, I would argue together with laity, fathers and mothers who have had their children abused both in the sacristy and in seminaries, and work together to make the correction I have outlined above. As for what the laity can do to save our children, they must pray our ladies rosary daily with their families that through her, the head of the serpent will be crushed. Our lady is the instrument of Satan’s destruction as outlined in the Bible (Genesis 3:15), not God. He built the world so we would be free to decide our eternal destiny with the champion of those who wish to love God and their neighbor as themselves being Mary, the Virgin Mother of God and the champion of those who wish to love only themselves the angel of light – Lucifer.
I know other bloggers that read this first blog might think I should have strung this out somehow to increase the suspense, get more followers etc. The problem is the Roman Catholic Church is possibly on the verge of losing all its valid apostolic lines, and should they not be validly renewed, we may have to try to figure out which of the non-schismatic orthodox lines are still good!!! Do we want to risk another 60 years of the rape of our children, while we try to figure out which if any other rites are valid saint producing rites(as opposed to demonic perverted priest/bishop producing) and the damnation of their souls or will we take tested known valid Latin rites, that have produced the likes of Pius V, Pius X, St. Francis of Assisi, St. Francis DeSales, St. Francis Cabrini, St. Ignatius of Loyola, St. Therese of Lisieux, St. Therese of Avila, St. Maria Goretti, the physician St. Gianna Beretta Molla, Father Kolbe and Padre Pio or limp on with the vernacular rite which has produced the likes of Cardinal McCarrick? This is a warning to all Roman Catholic bishops, cardinals and popes: mandate the return to the Latin mass canonized by Pius V, known good Latin episcopal consecration and priestly ordination rites, proceeding from a valid apostolic line or face the irrelevance envisioned by your communist, occult or masonic advisaries!!! Yes, with the fact that there are probably valid non-schismatic orthodox apostolic episcopal lines that are good, and orthodox patriarchs anathematizing the current Roman Catholic Pontiff (the present year being 2018) for heresy, it seems, God had a backup plan. The question is do we proceed with known good episcopal consecrations and priestly ordinations or exhaust all valid Roman Catholic Episcopal lines, possibly spend another 60 years or more (in 20 years when those lines are exhausted) trying to find which of the other orthodox rites is good enough to produce holy priests, holy bishops, holy popes and saints like padre Pio or Mother Teresa (yes, when she became a nun and established her order in 1950 we were still under the old Latin rite which did not change into the current ordinary rite until about 1968)?
There are some “softer” minded Catholics that might wonder why God would be so legalistic about the transfer of episcopal or priestly power. I feel these are the same kind of people who question why we need originalist judges. Wikipedia says “originalism is a way to interpret the constitution’s meaning as stable from the time of enactment, which can be changed only by the steps set out in Article Five [of the constitution].” This, I believe is a problem, because just as a judge not subscribing to the originalist philosophy could have said back in the 30’s the word men in the constitution did not actually mean just males but also included women so that women would then be able to vote. Similarly, a judge could also have said, in NAZI Germany that the word man, in the law books, did not include Jews because they were an inferior race and therefore could be euthanized just like a dog. God made it so you had to say the right words and have the right intention to transfer the power of the episcopate or of a priest, in my humble opinion (IMHO), so if innovators, such as we have in the church today, who planned to do evil, in their pride would change the form to try to invalidate the sacraments thereby revealing themselves. As it is, we can see their mischief and were other faithful catholics to know their faith better or the ones that did, did not trust the magisterium so much, I feel we would not be in the mess we are in now. Let us be clear, the problem wit invalid sacraments, like confession, leads to humans not being able to obtain the graces they need to get to heaven, in the case of confession the forgiveness of their sins, thereby allowing them to go to hell.
God always requires what he does of us for out benefit. He is an all powerful God so has no needs and an all-loving God and so makes laws for our benefit, not simply for our discomfort to see if he can trip us up like some secularist see the reason for his laws. His laws are to discipline us to bring out perfection as well as to insure we are not deceived by the devil so that we may enjoy an eternity of happiness in heaven in addition to the maximum amount of happiness possible in this, our present, earthly reality.
The reason I have waited so long to start this blog is, when I started to see the massive deterioration happening with the Cardinal McCarrick revelations, I was in the middle east. This is when I decided things had gotten so bad that my perspective might be of help to fellow traditional Roman Catholics of a Thomistic philosophical bent who might subscribe to the above thesis that the Latin Trent council based (Tridentine) mass and sacraments might actually be the only valid and efficacious forms of catholic worship (read here ones that produce holy clergy like St. Padre Pio, as well as good holy catholic moms like St. Gianna Beretta Molla, dads, children and nuns like mother Teresa for our catholic schools).
I appeal to the Blessed Virgin Mary for her assistance in prayer on this15th day of September 2018 when I first roughly penned this blog and to good laity/clergy rise to fix this if there is merit in my argument.
Traditional Thomistic Catholic 